ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

MEREC-G×CRITIC-M×
分野意思決定意思決定
系統MCDMMCDM
提唱年20211995
提唱者Keshavarz Ghorabaee, Hosseinzadeh Lotfi et al.Based on Diakoulaki et al.'s CRITIC; modified variants developed later
種類Objective weight derivation via removal impact assessmentObjective weight derivation via correlation and variance
原典Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., Behzadi, M., & Sałabun, W. (2021). MEREC: A new multi-criteria model to evaluate wind farm locations. Sustainability, 12(15), 6136. link ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research, 22(7), 763-770. DOI ↗
別名MEREC-G, Generalized MERECCRITIC-M, Modified CRITIC
関連33
概要MEREC-G (Method Based on Removal Effects of Criteria - Generalized) is an objective weight derivation method that assigns weights based on the impact of removing each criterion from the decision analysis. The core idea is that important criteria, when removed, cause large changes in the final ranking. Generalized variants extend the original MEREC to various aggregation logic and decision contexts.CRITIC-M (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation - Modified) is an objective weight derivation method that extends the classical CRITIC approach. It assigns weights to criteria based on two intrinsic properties of the decision matrix: variance (how much a criterion differentiates alternatives) and correlation (how much a criterion conflicts with or supplements others). Modified variants adjust the formulation to improve robustness or interpretability.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: MEREC-G · CRITIC-M. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare