ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

マシューズ相関係数 (Matthews Correlation Coefficient)×F1スコア×Recall (感度)×
分野モデル評価モデル評価モデル評価
系統MCDMMCDMMCDM
提唱年1975197920th century
提唱者Brian W. MatthewsC. J. van RijsbergenHistorical statistical foundations
種類Evaluation metricEvaluation metricEvaluation metric
原典Matthews, B. W. (1975). Comparison of predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Protein Structure, 405(2), 442-451. DOI ↗van Rijsbergen, C. J. (1979). Information Retrieval (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. link ↗Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗
別名Phi Coefficient, Binary Classification CorrelationF-measure, Harmonic MeanSensitivity, True Positive Rate, TPR
関連555
概要The Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) is a correlation measure between predicted and actual binary classifications. It ranges from -1 to 1 and is considered one of the most reliable single-score metrics for evaluating binary classifiers, especially on imbalanced datasets.The F1-score is the harmonic mean of precision and recall, providing a single metric that balances both concerns. It was introduced by van Rijsbergen in information retrieval and has become a standard metric for evaluating classification models where both precision and recall are important.Recall measures the proportion of actual positive cases that were correctly identified by the classifier. It answers the question: 'Of all the cases that were truly positive, how many did we find?' Recall is critical in scenarios where missing positive cases is costly.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Matthews Correlation Coefficient · F1-Score · Recall (Sensitivity). 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare