ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

マシューズ相関係数 (Matthews Correlation Coefficient)×Balanced Accuracy×F1スコア×
分野モデル評価モデル評価モデル評価
系統MCDMMCDMMCDM
提唱年197520101979
提唱者Brian W. MatthewsBrodersen, Ong, Stephan, and BuhmannC. J. van Rijsbergen
種類Evaluation metricEvaluation metricEvaluation metric
原典Matthews, B. W. (1975). Comparison of predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Protein Structure, 405(2), 442-451. DOI ↗Brodersen, K. H., Ong, C. S., Stephan, K. E., & Buhmann, J. M. (2010). The balanced accuracy and its posterior distribution. 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), 3121-3124. DOI ↗van Rijsbergen, C. J. (1979). Information Retrieval (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. link ↗
別名Phi Coefficient, Binary Classification CorrelationAverage Recall, Equal-weight Average SensitivityF-measure, Harmonic Mean
関連555
概要The Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) is a correlation measure between predicted and actual binary classifications. It ranges from -1 to 1 and is considered one of the most reliable single-score metrics for evaluating binary classifiers, especially on imbalanced datasets.Balanced accuracy is the average of recall values computed for each class separately. It corrects for class imbalance by giving equal weight to the performance on each class, regardless of class frequency in the dataset.The F1-score is the harmonic mean of precision and recall, providing a single metric that balances both concerns. It was introduced by van Rijsbergen in information retrieval and has become a standard metric for evaluating classification models where both precision and recall are important.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Matthews Correlation Coefficient · Balanced Accuracy · F1-Score. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare