ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Many-Facet Rasch Measurement×一般化可能性理論(G理論)×
分野Education心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年19891963–1972
提唱者John Michael LinacreLee J. Cronbach, Goldine Gleser, Harinder Nanda, Nageswari Rajaratnam
種類Rasch model extension adding rater and other facets to person and itemVariance-components reliability model
原典Linacre, J. M. (1989). Many-Facet Rasch Measurement. MESA Press. ISBN: 9780941938020Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H. & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles. Wiley. link ↗
別名MFRM, Many-Faceted Rasch Model, Facets Model, Linacre Facets ModelG-theory, G-study / D-study framework, variance components reliability
関連44
概要Many-facet Rasch measurement (MFRM) extends the basic Rasch model to assessments mediated by raters. Beyond examinee ability and item difficulty, it adds explicit parameters for rater severity and for any other facet of the rating situation — task, occasion, rating criterion — placing them all on one common logit scale. Developed by John Michael Linacre, MFRM lets analysts estimate and adjust for the fact that some raters are systematically harsh and others lenient, producing 'fair' ability estimates that do not penalize an examinee for happening to draw a severe judge.Generalizability Theory is a psychometric framework that decomposes observed score variance into multiple sources — persons, items, raters, occasions, and their interactions — using analysis of variance. It replaces the single reliability coefficient of classical test theory with a family of coefficients that tell researchers how well scores generalize across different measurement conditions.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Many-Facet Rasch Measurement · Generalizability Theory. 2026-06-25に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare