ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

機械学習拡張逆確率重み付け(ML-IPW)×逆確率重み付け法 (IPW / IPTW)×
分野因果推論因果推論
系統Regression modelRegression model
提唱年2003-20182000
提唱者Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (semiparametric foundation, 2003); Chernozhukov et al. (DML framework, 2018)Robins, Hernán & Brumback
種類Semiparametric causal estimatorCausal inference weighting estimator
原典Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Demirer, M., Duflo, E., Hansen, C., Newey, W., & Robins, J. (2018). Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters. The Econometrics Journal, 21(1), C1-C68. DOI ↗Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗
別名ML-IPW, nonparametric IPW, data-adaptive IPW, ML-augmented propensity weightingIPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting
関連55
概要Machine learning-augmented inverse probability weighting replaces parametric logistic regression with flexible ML algorithms to estimate treatment propensity scores, then reweights the sample to balance treated and control units. By leveraging data-adaptive learners such as lasso, random forests, or gradient boosting, ML-IPW controls for high-dimensional and nonlinear confounders that classical IPW misses, while retaining the intuitive weighting framework.Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Machine Learning-Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting · Inverse Probability Weighting. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare