ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

縦断的法則的妥当性×構成概念妥当性(Nomological Validity)×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年1955 (concept); longitudinal extension 1990s–2000s1955
提唱者Cronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept, 1955); longitudinal extension developed in organizational and personality research from the 1990s onwardLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
種類Validity evaluationValidity evidence framework
原典Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗
別名longitudinal construct validity, nomological network validation across time, longitudinal criterion-related validity, temporal nomological validitynomological network validity, construct network validity, nomological web validity
関連66
概要Longitudinal nomological validity evaluates whether a construct's theoretically predicted relationships with other constructs hold consistently across multiple measurement occasions. It extends the nomological network framework of Cronbach and Meehl (1955) to longitudinal designs, testing whether a scale behaves as theory demands not only at a single time point but over time.Nomological validity evaluates whether a construct behaves as theory predicts within a broader network of related constructs. It is not a single statistical test but an accumulation of evidence that the measure fits coherently into a web of theoretically grounded relationships — demonstrating that what is measured is what the theory says it should measure.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Longitudinal Nomological Validity · Nomological Validity. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare