ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

縦断的法則的妥当性×構成概念妥当性×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年1955 (concept); longitudinal extension 1990s–2000s1955
提唱者Cronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept, 1955); longitudinal extension developed in organizational and personality research from the 1990s onwardLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
種類Validity evaluationValidity evaluation framework
原典Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗
別名longitudinal construct validity, nomological network validation across time, longitudinal criterion-related validity, temporal nomological validityconstruct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation
関連66
概要Longitudinal nomological validity evaluates whether a construct's theoretically predicted relationships with other constructs hold consistently across multiple measurement occasions. It extends the nomological network framework of Cronbach and Meehl (1955) to longitudinal designs, testing whether a scale behaves as theory demands not only at a single time point but over time.Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Longitudinal Nomological Validity · Construct Validity. 2026-06-15に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare