手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 時系列文書分析× | 文書分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野≠ | 質的手法 | 質的研究 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 2003–2009 (formalized in qualitative research methodology) | 1920 |
| 提唱者≠ | Glenn A. Bowen (document analysis framework); Johnny Saldaña (longitudinal qualitative methods) | Max Weber and Karl Mannheim |
| 種類≠ | Qualitative longitudinal research design | Method |
| 原典≠ | Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗ | Scott, J. (1990). A Matter of Record: Documentary Sources in Social Research. Polity Press. ISBN: 978-0745608419 |
| 別名 | longitudinal documentary research, longitudinal archival analysis, repeated document analysis, LDA | documentary analysis, textual analysis, content analysis of documents, archival research |
| 関連≠ | 3 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | Longitudinal document analysis is a qualitative research approach that systematically collects and analyzes documents at multiple time points to trace how phenomena, discourses, policies, or organizational practices change over time. By treating documents as primary data sources rather than supplementary evidence, researchers can reconstruct temporal trajectories, identify turning points, and understand how meaning evolves across extended periods without requiring direct participant contact. | Document analysis is a systematic qualitative research method for examining written, visual, or audiovisual sources—such as policy documents, historical records, organizational records, media reports, emails, social media posts, photographs, or videos—to extract meaning, identify patterns, and understand social phenomena. Developed by Weber and Mannheim in early 20th-century sociology, the method bridges historical research, content analysis, and textual interpretation. Document analysis is used across disciplines to understand organizational change, policy evolution, media representation, historical events, and cultural meaning. Documents provide evidence of what organizations, institutions, or societies value, decide, and communicate, often revealing contradictions between policy and practice. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|