ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

縦断的収束的妥当性×構成概念妥当性×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年1997–20031955
提唱者Cole & Maxwell; Widaman & ReiseLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
種類Validity evidence frameworkValidity evaluation framework
原典Cole, D. A. & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 558–577. DOI ↗Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗
別名longitudinal construct validity, repeated-measure convergent validity, cross-time convergent validity, temporal convergent validityconstruct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation
関連66
概要Longitudinal convergent validity evaluates whether a scale's indicators correlate with theoretically related constructs not just at a single time point but consistently across repeated measurement occasions. It extends standard convergent validity testing into longitudinal designs to ensure that the scale measures the intended construct in the same meaningful way over time.Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Longitudinal convergent validity · Construct Validity. 2026-06-15に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare