ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

項目応答理論 (IRT)×Vertical Scaling×
分野心理測定学Education
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年1952–19682014
提唱者Frederic M. Lord (and Allan Birnbaum for the 2PL/3PL models)Educational measurement tradition (Thurstone; Kolen & Brennan synthesis)
種類Probabilistic measurement modelConstruction of a single developmental score scale spanning multiple grades
原典Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Addison-Wesley. link ↗Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2014). Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking: Methods and Practices (3rd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 9781493903160
別名IRT, latent trait theory, item characteristic curve theory, modern test theoryDevelopmental Scaling, Vertical Linking, Cross-Grade Scaling, Growth Scale Construction
関連54
概要Item response theory models the probability that a respondent answers an item correctly (or endorses it) as a function of the respondent's latent trait level and the item's own statistical properties — difficulty, discrimination, and guessing. Unlike classical test theory, IRT places persons and items on the same scale, yielding measurement that is sample-independent for items and test-independent for persons.Vertical scaling places tests written for different grade levels onto a single continuous score scale so that growth from one grade to the next can be measured in common units. Unlike horizontal equating, which links alternate forms intended to be interchangeable, vertical scaling deliberately links tests of differing difficulty and content to build a developmental continuum spanning, for example, grades 3 through 8. It is the measurement foundation that lets a fourth-grade and a fifth-grade score be subtracted to express how much a student grew.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Item Response Theory · Vertical Scaling. 2026-06-25に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare