ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

項目分析(古典的テスト理論)×項目応答理論 (IRT)×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年19791952–1968
提唱者Classical Test Theory tradition; foundational texts by Allen & Yen (1979) and Crocker & Algina (1986)Frederic M. Lord (and Allan Birnbaum for the 2PL/3PL models)
種類Descriptive / psychometric screeningProbabilistic measurement model
原典Allen, M. J. & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to Measurement Theory. Brooks/Cole. ISBN: 978-0818501333Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Addison-Wesley. link ↗
別名Madde Analizi (Klasik Test Kuramı), CTT item analysis, classical item analysisIRT, latent trait theory, item characteristic curve theory, modern test theory
関連55
概要Item analysis is the foundational psychometric procedure for evaluating the quality of individual test or scale items within the Classical Test Theory (CTT) framework, as systematised by Allen and Yen (1979) and Crocker and Algina (1986). It produces an item difficulty index, an item discrimination index, and a distractor analysis for each item, enabling test developers to identify items that are too easy, too hard, or failing to separate high- and low-ability respondents.Item response theory models the probability that a respondent answers an item correctly (or endorses it) as a function of the respondent's latent trait level and the item's own statistical properties — difficulty, discrimination, and guessing. Unlike classical test theory, IRT places persons and items on the same scale, yielding measurement that is sample-independent for items and test-independent for persons.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Item Analysis · Item Response Theory. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare