手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 逆確率重み付け法 (IPW / IPTW)× | DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) による因果推論特定 (do-calculus)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 因果推論 | 因果推論 |
| 系統 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 提唱年≠ | 2000 | 2009 |
| 提唱者≠ | Robins, Hernán & Brumback | Judea Pearl |
| 種類≠ | Causal inference weighting estimator | Causal identification framework |
| 原典≠ | Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗ | Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0521895606 |
| 別名≠ | IPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting | do-calculus, backdoor adjustment, Pearl causal identification, DAG ile Nedensel Tanımlama (do-calculus) |
| 関連 | 5 | 5 |
| 概要≠ | Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias. | DAG causal identification is a framework, developed by Judea Pearl (2009), that encodes causal assumptions as a directed acyclic graph and uses the do-calculus rules to determine whether and how a causal effect can be identified from observational data. It systematically handles confounders, instrumental variables, and backdoor paths. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|