ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

因果推論のための操作変数(IV)法×費用対効果分析 (CEA)×
分野医療経済学医療経済学
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1990s (modern applications)1984
提唱者Angrist & Pischke (applied econometrics); rooted in econometric theoryDrummond & Stoddart (Health Economics Research Group, McMaster University)
種類MethodMethod
原典Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press. link ↗Gold, M. R., Siegel, J. E., Russell, L. B., & Weinstein, M. C. (Eds.). (1996). Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press. link ↗
別名IV, two-stage least squares, TSLS, causal estimationCEA, ICER, Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio
関連35
概要Instrumental variables (IV) is an econometric method to estimate causal effects when treatment or exposure is not randomly assigned and confounding is severe or unmeasured. IV relies on a third variable (instrument) that influences treatment but does not directly affect the outcome, allowing researchers to isolate the causal effect from the noise of confounding. Developed extensively in econometrics (Angrist & Pischke, 1990s–2000s), IV methods are increasingly used in health economics and health services research to leverage natural experiments and policy changes.Cost-effectiveness analysis compares the incremental cost per unit of health benefit gained by one intervention relative to a comparator (standard care or best alternative). Developed rigorously in the 1980s by Drummond, Stoddart, and colleagues, CEA is now the standard framework for technology appraisal globally. NICE, HAS, CADTH, and other health technology assessment bodies use CEA to decide which treatments warrant public funding and at what price.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Instrumental Variables in Health Research · Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. 2026-06-19に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare