手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 審査機関(IRB)× | 研究誠実性の原則× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 研究倫理 | 研究倫理 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 1974 | 2007 |
| 提唱者≠ | U.S. Federal Requirement (National Research Act 1974); International adoption by WMA and research institutions globally | Multiple (National Academies, NIH/ORI, ESOMAR, individual discipline standards) |
| 種類≠ | Standard | Framework |
| 原典≠ | U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45, Part 46: Protection of Human Subjects. Office of the Federal Register. link ↗ | National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Fostering Integrity in Research. The National Academies Press. DOI ↗ |
| 別名 | IRB, Research Ethics Committee, REC | Responsible Conduct of Research, RCR, Research Ethics Standards |
| 関連 | 4 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | The Institutional Review Board (IRB) is the independent ethics committee established at research institutions to review and approve human subjects research, ensuring compliance with ethical principles and federal regulations. Created as a legal requirement by the U.S. National Research Act (1974) and now adopted globally, the IRB serves as the primary mechanism for protecting research subjects while enabling legitimate research to proceed. No human subjects research can begin without IRB approval. | Research integrity encompasses the ethical and professional standards that guide responsible conduct in all aspects of research—from study design and data collection through analysis, reporting, and publication. The core principles—honesty, transparency, accountability, respect, and stewardship—ensure that research is trustworthy, reproducible, and contributes legitimate knowledge. These principles are universal across disciplines and are enforced through institutional policies, professional standards, and regulatory oversight. Violations of research integrity undermine scientific credibility and can harm subjects, institutions, and public trust. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|