手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| ハイブリッド中心複合計画× | 中心複合計画法× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 実験計画法 | 実験計画法 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 1976 | 1951 |
| 提唱者≠ | K. G. Roquemore | George E. P. Box and K. B. Wilson |
| 種類 | Response surface experimental design | Response surface experimental design |
| 原典≠ | Roquemore, K. G. (1976). Hybrid designs for quadratic response surfaces. Technometrics, 18(4), 419–423. DOI ↗ | Box, G. E. P., & Wilson, K. B. (1951). On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 13(1), 1–45. DOI ↗ |
| 別名 | Hybrid CCD, HCCD, modified central composite design, hybrid RSM design | CCD, Box-Wilson design, central composite response surface design, rotatable central composite design |
| 関連 | 3 | 3 |
| 概要≠ | Hybrid Central Composite Design (Hybrid CCD) is a class of response surface designs introduced by Roquemore (1976) that combines the structural properties of classical central composite designs with modified or reduced point configurations to achieve rotatability or near-rotatability with fewer experimental runs than a standard CCD, making it especially practical when the number of factors is three to six and experimental resources are limited. | Central Composite Design (CCD) is a second-order response surface design that allows researchers to efficiently fit a full quadratic model relating multiple continuous input factors to one or more response variables. Introduced by Box and Wilson in 1951, it combines a factorial (or fractional factorial) core, axial (star) points, and center-point replicates into a single unified design, making it the most widely used design for process optimization in engineering, chemistry, and manufacturing. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|