手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 異質的治療効果粗化厳密マッチング× | 粗化完全マッチング(CEM)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 因果推論 | 因果推論 |
| 系統 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 提唱年≠ | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 |
| 提唱者≠ | Iacus, King & Porro (CEM foundation, 2012); subgroup HTE extensions by Imai & colleagues | Iacus, King, & Porro |
| 種類≠ | Matching-based causal inference with subgroup CATE estimation | Matching / causal inference |
| 原典 | Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗ | Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗ |
| 別名≠ | HTE-CEM, CEM with CATE estimation, subgroup CEM, coarsened exact matching with effect heterogeneity | CEM, coarsened matching, monotonic imbalance bounding matching |
| 関連≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 概要≠ | Heterogeneous treatment effect coarsened exact matching (HTE-CEM) extends the coarsened exact matching framework to estimate how treatment effects vary across subgroups or individual characteristics. After CEM creates balanced strata by coarsening continuous covariates into bins and exactly matching units within each bin, conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) are computed within or across these strata, revealing where treatment works, for whom, and by how much. | Coarsened Exact Matching is a preprocessing method that achieves covariate balance by temporarily coarsening continuous variables into bins, exactly matching treated and control units within those bins, and then discarding all unmatched units. Introduced by Iacus, King, and Porro (2011, 2012), it bounds imbalance on each covariate independently, yielding a matched sample on which any estimator can be applied without relying on a propensity score model. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|