ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

NLPにおけるジェンダーバイアス検出×固有表現抽出 (Coreference Resolution)×
分野テキストマイニングテキストマイニング
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年2017–2018 (seminal benchmarks)1978
提唱者Caliskan et al. (2017); Zhao et al. (2018)Hobbs (1978); Lee et al. (2017, neural end-to-end)
種類NLP bias auditing pipelineNLP information-extraction task
原典Caliskan, A., Bryson, J. J., & Narayanan, A. (2017). Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases. Science, 356(6334), 183–186. DOI ↗Lee, K. et al. (2017). End-to-end Neural Coreference Resolution. EMNLP. link ↗
別名Toplumsal Cinsiyet Yanlılığı Tespiti — NLP, bias auditing NLP, WEAT, WinoBiascoreference, anaphora resolution, Eşgönderim Çözümleme (Coreference Resolution)
関連54
概要Gender bias detection in NLP is a family of statistical and embedding-based methods used to measure stereotyping, representational imbalance, and occupational bias in text corpora and language models. Grounded in benchmarks established by Caliskan et al. (2017) with the Word Embedding Association Test (WEAT) and Zhao et al. (2018) with the WinoBias dataset, these methods produce quantitative evidence of gender bias rather than qualitative impressions. They are widely applied in ethical AI research, media analysis, and fairness auditing of machine-learning systems.Coreference resolution is a natural-language-processing task that detects when different expressions in a text refer to the same entity — for example a name, a later pronoun, and a descriptive phrase all pointing at one person. Rooted in early linguistic work by Hobbs (1978) and advanced by the end-to-end neural model of Lee et al. (2017), it improves the quality of information extraction and text understanding.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Gender Bias Detection · Coreference Resolution. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare