ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Factorial Survey Experiment×Conjoint Survey Experiment×
分野Political SciencePolitical Science
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年19822014
提唱者Peter H. Rossi and collaboratorsJens Hainmueller, Daniel Hopkins, Teppei Yamamoto
種類Multi-factor randomized vignette experimentMulti-attribute forced-choice survey experiment with design-based causal estimands
原典Wallander, L. (2009). 25 Years of Factorial Surveys in Sociology: A Review. Social Science Research, 38(3), 505–520. DOI ↗Hainmueller, J., Hopkins, D. J., & Yamamoto, T. (2014). Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments. Political Analysis, 22(1), 1–30. DOI ↗
別名Factorial survey, Factorial survey approach, Multi-factor vignette survey, Rossi vignette methodCausal conjoint, Forced-choice conjoint experiment, AMCE conjoint, Conjoint experiment
関連34
概要A factorial survey experiment, often simply called a factorial survey, asks respondents to judge short descriptions — vignettes — whose multiple features are fully crossed and randomly varied. By factorially combining many dimensions, each at several levels, the design generates a large universe of vignettes; respondents rate a random sample of them, and regression of the ratings on the dimension levels recovers the independent causal effect of each feature on judgment. It scales the single-scenario vignette experiment up to many simultaneously manipulated attributes.A conjoint survey experiment presents respondents with profiles — of candidates, immigrants, policies, or products — described by several attributes whose levels are independently randomized, and asks respondents to choose between or rate the profiles. Hainmueller, Hopkins, and Yamamoto's 2014 framework places this design on a rigorous causal footing, defining the average marginal component effect (AMCE) as the design-based causal effect of an attribute level, averaged over the randomization distribution of all other attributes. It lets political scientists estimate the relative causal weight of many decision factors simultaneously from realistic, multidimensional choices.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Factorial Survey Experiment · Conjoint Survey Experiment. 2026-06-25に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare