ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

評価指向の実用的混合研究法×アクションリサーチ×
分野研究デザイン質的研究
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1990s–2000s1946
提唱者Jennifer C. Greene; Abbas Tashakkori & Charles TeddlieKurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & Bradbury
種類Mixed methods research designMethod
原典Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787984090Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. DOI ↗
別名pragmatic evaluation mixed methods, program evaluation mixed methods, applied pragmatic mixed methods, mixed methods program evaluationParticipatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative Inquiry
関連21
概要Evaluation-oriented pragmatic mixed methods is a research design that combines quantitative and qualitative data collection within a pragmatist philosophical stance, expressly to evaluate programs, policies, or interventions. Rather than adhering rigidly to a single paradigm, it selects methods for their fitness to answer evaluation questions about program effectiveness, outcomes, and stakeholder experiences. The design is widely applied in education, public health, social services, and development evaluation contexts.Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Evaluation-oriented Pragmatic Mixed Methods · Action Research. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare