手法を比較

	評価に焦点を当てた法的コンテンツ分析	文書分析
分野	フィールド調査法	質的研究
系統	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
提唱年	Late 20th century; evaluation-focused applications emerged prominently from the 1990s onward	1920
提唱者	Builds on Klaus Krippendorff's content analysis framework and legal scholarship traditions	Max Weber and Karl Mannheim
種類	Systematic qualitative/quantitative legal document analysis	Method
原典	Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761915454	Scott, J. (1990). A Matter of Record: Documentary Sources in Social Research. Polity Press. ISBN: 978-0745608419
別名	legal text evaluation, evaluative legal content analysis, assessment-oriented legal content analysis, legal document evaluation research	documentary analysis, textual analysis, content analysis of documents, archival research
関連	5	4
概要	Evaluation-focused legal content analysis is a systematic method for examining legal texts — statutes, regulations, court decisions, contracts, or policy documents — with an explicit evaluative purpose: to assess whether and how well legal instruments achieve specified goals, standards, or values. It combines the structured coding procedures of content analysis with normative legal evaluation criteria, enabling researchers and practitioners to make evidence-based assessments of legal effectiveness, compliance, or quality.	Document analysis is a systematic qualitative research method for examining written, visual, or audiovisual sources—such as policy documents, historical records, organizational records, media reports, emails, social media posts, photographs, or videos—to extract meaning, identify patterns, and understand social phenomena. Developed by Weber and Mannheim in early 20th-century sociology, the method bridges historical research, content analysis, and textual interpretation. Document analysis is used across disciplines to understand organizational change, policy evolution, media representation, historical events, and cultural meaning. Documents provide evidence of what organizations, institutions, or societies value, decide, and communicate, often revealing contradictions between policy and practice.