手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 介入混合研究法(均等加重)× | 変容的混合研究法デザイン× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 研究デザイン | 研究デザイン |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 2000s–2010s | 2003–2009 |
| 提唱者≠ | Creswell & Plano Clark (weighting framework); intervention design tradition in mixed methods | Donna M. Mertens; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark |
| 種類 | Mixed methods research design | Mixed methods research design |
| 原典≠ | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379 | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379 |
| 別名 | equal-priority intervention MMR, balanced intervention mixed methods, QUAL=QUAN intervention design, equal-status intervention mixed design | transformative design, advocacy mixed methods, emancipatory mixed methods, social-justice mixed methods |
| 関連 | 6 | 6 |
| 概要≠ | Equal-weight intervention mixed methods is a research design in which both quantitative and qualitative strands are assigned equal priority and are embedded within or alongside an intervention, program, or experiment. The design evaluates not only whether an intervention works (QUAN outcomes) but also how and why it works or fails (QUAL processes), with neither strand treated as secondary. It is particularly suited to program evaluation, clinical trials with process components, and educational or social interventions. | Transformative mixed methods design embeds a social-justice or advocacy theoretical framework — such as feminism, critical race theory, disability studies, or indigenous worldviews — as the overarching lens that guides every decision about data collection, integration, and use. Both quantitative and qualitative strands serve the goal of advancing equity, challenging power structures, and producing actionable knowledge for marginalized communities. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|