手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 動的傾向スコアマッチング× | 傾向スコアマッチング× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野≠ | 因果推論 | 研究統計 |
| 系統≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 1986-2010 | 1983 |
| 提唱者≠ | Robins (1986) on sequential treatments; Lechner & Miquel (2010) on dynamic matching | Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin |
| 種類≠ | Sequential causal matching | Method |
| 原典≠ | Lechner, M., & Miquel, R. (2010). Identification of the effects of dynamic treatments by sequential conditional independence assumptions. Empirical Economics, 39(1), 111-137. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗ |
| 別名≠ | dynamic PSM, sequential propensity score matching, longitudinal propensity matching, DPSM | PSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance |
| 関連≠ | 6 | 3 |
| 概要≠ | Dynamic Propensity Score Matching (DPSM) extends classic propensity score matching to settings where treatment is assigned repeatedly over time and earlier treatment choices influence later ones. It estimates the causal effect of entire treatment sequences or regime changes by constructing matched comparisons at each decision point using the full history of covariates and prior treatments. | Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|