ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

動的傾向スコアマッチング×逆確率重み付け法 (IPW / IPTW)×
分野因果推論因果推論
系統Regression modelRegression model
提唱年1986-20102000
提唱者Robins (1986) on sequential treatments; Lechner & Miquel (2010) on dynamic matchingRobins, Hernán & Brumback
種類Sequential causal matchingCausal inference weighting estimator
原典Lechner, M., & Miquel, R. (2010). Identification of the effects of dynamic treatments by sequential conditional independence assumptions. Empirical Economics, 39(1), 111-137. DOI ↗Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗
別名dynamic PSM, sequential propensity score matching, longitudinal propensity matching, DPSMIPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting
関連65
概要Dynamic Propensity Score Matching (DPSM) extends classic propensity score matching to settings where treatment is assigned repeatedly over time and earlier treatment choices influence later ones. It estimates the causal effect of entire treatment sequences or regime changes by constructing matched comparisons at each decision point using the full history of covariates and prior treatments.Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Dynamic Propensity Score Matching · Inverse Probability Weighting. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare