ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

判別妥当性×構成概念妥当性×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年19591955
提唱者Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. FiskeLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
種類Validity evidence / psychometric evaluationValidity evaluation framework
原典Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗
別名discriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validityconstruct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation
関連56
概要Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling.Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Discriminant Validity · Construct Validity. 2026-06-15に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare