ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

デジタル・エスノグラフィー×談話分析×文書分析×
分野質的手法質的研究質的研究
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年Late 1990s – 2000s1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell)1920
提唱者Christine Hine (virtual ethnography); Robert V. Kozinets (netnography)Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret WetherellMax Weber and Karl Mannheim
種類Qualitative research methodMethodMethod
原典Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. Sage. ISBN: 978-1847875228Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗Scott, J. (1990). A Matter of Record: Documentary Sources in Social Research. Polity Press. ISBN: 978-0745608419
別名online ethnography, virtual ethnography, internet ethnography, netnographyDA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysisdocumentary analysis, textual analysis, content analysis of documents, archival research
関連624
概要Digital ethnography is a qualitative research method that adapts traditional ethnographic fieldwork to online and digitally mediated settings. Drawing on sustained participant observation, document collection, and sometimes interviews, the researcher immerses themselves in one or more digital communities — social media platforms, forums, gaming spaces, or messaging groups — to understand how culture, identity, and social practice are constructed through digital interaction. The approach recognises that online spaces are not merely reflections of offline life but distinctive sites of cultural production in their own right.Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures.Document analysis is a systematic qualitative research method for examining written, visual, or audiovisual sources—such as policy documents, historical records, organizational records, media reports, emails, social media posts, photographs, or videos—to extract meaning, identify patterns, and understand social phenomena. Developed by Weber and Mannheim in early 20th-century sociology, the method bridges historical research, content analysis, and textual interpretation. Document analysis is used across disciplines to understand organizational change, policy evolution, media representation, historical events, and cultural meaning. Documents provide evidence of what organizations, institutions, or societies value, decide, and communicate, often revealing contradictions between policy and practice.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Digital Ethnography · Discourse Analysis · Document Analysis. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare