ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

項目応答理論における項目特性曲線(ICC)の差×多群同時確認的因子分析(MG-CFA)×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年1970s–19931971
提唱者William H. Angoff and colleagues (ETS); systematized by Holland & WainerKarl Jöreskog
種類Item-level bias detectionMeasurement model / invariance test
原典Holland, P. W. & Wainer, H. (Eds.) (1993). Differential Item Functioning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 978-0805809589Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗
別名DIF, item bias analysis, measurement non-equivalence, item-level measurement biasMG-CFA, multi-group CFA, measurement invariance testing, multi-sample CFA
関連56
概要Differential item functioning identifies test or survey items that behave differently for examinees from different groups — such as gender, ethnicity, or language background — after controlling for the underlying ability or trait being measured. DIF analysis is essential for fairness evaluation in educational testing and psychological scale development.Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis tests whether a measurement model holds equivalently across two or more groups — such as cultures, genders, or time points. By imposing increasingly stringent equality constraints and comparing model fit, it determines whether comparisons of latent mean scores are justified.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Differential Item Functioning · Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare