手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 項目応答理論における項目応答の不均衡分析 (DIF)× | 確認的因子分析（CFA）× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 心理測定学 | 心理測定学 |
| 系統 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 提唱年≠ | 1988 | 1969 |
| 提唱者≠ | Paul W. Holland & Dorothy T. Thayer (Mantel-Haenszel approach, 1988) | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| 種類≠ | Item-level fairness / measurement equivalence analysis | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| 原典≠ | Holland, P. W. & Thayer, D. T. (1988). Differential Item Performance and the Mantel-Haenszel Procedure. ETS Research Report Series. link ↗ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| 別名≠ | Madde Yanlılık Analizi (DIF — Differential Item Functioning), item bias analysis, Mantel-Haenszel DIF, Lord chi-square DIF | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| 関連 | 4 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | Differential Item Functioning analysis examines whether examinees from different groups — such as gender, ethnicity, or language background — who have the same underlying ability respond differently to a test item. First formalised by Holland and Thayer in 1988 via the Mantel-Haenszel procedure, it is the principal tool in modern test development for detecting and removing item bias. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|