手法を比較

	間欠需要のためのクロストンの方法	ARIMA（自己回帰和分移動平均）モデル	ポアソン回帰と負の二項回帰
分野	計量経済学	計量経済学	計量経済学
系統	Regression model	Regression model	Regression model
提唱年	1972	2015	1998
提唱者	J. D. Croston (1972)	Box & Jenkins (Box-Jenkins methodology)	Cameron & Trivedi (textbook treatment); Hilbe (negative binomial)
種類	Intermittent demand time-series forecasting	Univariate time-series model	Generalized linear model for count data
原典	Croston, J. D. (1972). Forecasting and Stock Control for Intermittent Demands. Operational Research Quarterly, 23(3), 289-303.	Box, G. E. P., Jenkins, G. M., Reinsel, G. C. & Ljung, G. M. (2015). Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control (5th ed.). Wiley. ISBN: 978-1118675021	Cameron, A. C. & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression Analysis of Count Data. Cambridge University Press.
別名	Croston method, intermittent demand forecasting, Croston Yöntemi — Aralıklı Talep Tahmini	Box-Jenkins model, ARIMA(p,d,q), ARIMA Modeli	count regression, log-linear count model, negative binomial regression, Poisson / Negatif Binom Regresyon
関連	4	5	4
概要	Croston's method, introduced by J. D. Croston in 1972, is a time-series forecasting technique built for intermittent demand series in which periods of zero demand are frequent. Instead of forecasting the raw series, it models the size of demand when it occurs and the interval between demand occurrences as two separate processes.	ARIMA is a univariate time-series forecasting model that combines autoregressive, integrated (differencing), and moving-average components to predict a single continuous series from its own past. It is the centrepiece of the Box-Jenkins methodology set out in Box, Jenkins, Reinsel & Ljung's Time Series Analysis (5th ed., 2015).	Poisson regression is a generalized linear model for count outcomes — events tallied as non-negative integers such as hospital admissions, accidents, or article counts. It models the log of the expected count as a linear function of the predictors, and is developed in the standard count-data treatment of Cameron and Trivedi (1998); when the counts are over-dispersed, the closely related negative binomial model (Hilbe, 2011) is preferred.