手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| クリティカル教育アクションリサーチ ― 教育現場における解放的探求× | クリティカル・エスノグラフィー× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野≠ | フィールド調査法 | 質的手法 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 1986 | Late 20th century (~1980s–1993 systematisation) |
| 提唱者≠ | Wilfred Carr & Stephen Kemmis | Jim Thomas (systematised); rooted in Frankfurt School critical theory (Adorno, Horkheimer) and feminist/postcolonial traditions |
| 種類≠ | Qualitative participatory research design | Qualitative research method |
| 原典≠ | Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge and Action Research. Falmer Press. ISBN: 978-1850000235 | Thomas, J. (1993). Doing Critical Ethnography. Sage Publications. link ↗ |
| 別名 | critical-emancipatory action research, CEAR, critical participatory action research in education, emancipatory educational inquiry | critical ethnographic research, critical qualitative ethnography, advocacy ethnography, emancipatory ethnography |
| 関連≠ | 4 | 6 |
| 概要≠ | Critical educational action research is a cyclical, participatory research design in which educators collaboratively examine and transform their own practice through iterative cycles of planning, action, observation, and critical reflection. Grounded in critical theory, it goes beyond improving techniques to questioning the social, institutional, and ideological conditions that shape educational practice, aiming at emancipation from unjust or oppressive structures. | Critical ethnography is a qualitative research approach that combines sustained fieldwork immersion with explicit critical theory to examine how power, inequality, and ideology shape the lived experiences of marginalised communities. Unlike conventional ethnography, which aims to describe a culture as it is, critical ethnography commits the researcher to questioning what is taken for granted and to producing knowledge that can serve as a resource for social change. Rooted in Frankfurt School critical theory and expanded through feminist, postcolonial, and race-critical traditions, it treats the research process itself as a political act. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|