ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

内容妥当性×尺度開発×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年19751991–1995
提唱者C. H. Lawshe (quantitative framework); earlier qualitative traditions in educational measurementMultiple contributors; codified by Robert DeVellis and Lee Anna Clark & David Watson
種類Validity evidence / expert judgement procedureMulti-step methodological framework
原典Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale Development: Theory and Applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1506341569
別名content-related validity, logical validity, face validity, content validationquestionnaire construction, instrument development, measurement scale construction, psychometric scale building
関連65
概要Content validity is evidence that a measurement instrument adequately samples the full domain of the construct it is intended to measure. It is established through systematic expert review and quantified with indices such as Lawshe's Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Lynn's Content Validity Index (CVI), making it the foundational validity step in scale development.Scale development is a structured, multi-step process for creating psychometrically sound measurement instruments that capture latent psychological constructs. It encompasses construct definition, item generation, expert review, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, reliability estimation, and validity evidence collection — producing a final set of items suitable for quantitative research.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Content Validity · Scale development. 2026-06-15に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare