ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

コンピュータ適応型テスト(CAT)における収束的妥当性×項目応答理論 (IRT)×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年1989–20001952–1968
提唱者Samuel Messick (validity framework); Wainer and colleagues (CAT context)Frederic M. Lord (and Allan Birnbaum for the 2PL/3PL models)
種類Validity evidence / construct validationProbabilistic measurement model
原典Wainer, H. (Ed.). (2000). Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 978-0805835113Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Addison-Wesley. link ↗
別名CAT convergent validity, adaptive test construct validation, CAT validity evidence, convergent validity in CATIRT, latent trait theory, item characteristic curve theory, modern test theory
関連55
概要Convergent validity assessment for computerized adaptive tests (CATs) examines whether the ability or trait estimates produced by an adaptive algorithm correlate substantially with scores from other measures of the same construct. Because each examinee receives a different subset of items in a CAT, demonstrating that the resulting scores still converge with theoretically related external measures is a critical step in establishing construct validity evidence.Item response theory models the probability that a respondent answers an item correctly (or endorses it) as a function of the respondent's latent trait level and the item's own statistical properties — difficulty, discrimination, and guessing. Unlike classical test theory, IRT places persons and items on the same scale, yielding measurement that is sample-independent for items and test-independent for persons.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Computerized Adaptive Test Convergent Validity · Item Response Theory. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare