ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

コンピュータ適応型テスト(CAT)における内容妥当性×項目応答理論 (IRT)×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年1975 / 19801952–1968
提唱者Lawshe (content validity); Lord & Weiss (CAT framework)Frederic M. Lord (and Allan Birnbaum for the 2PL/3PL models)
種類Validity evaluation / test designProbabilistic measurement model
原典Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Addison-Wesley. link ↗
別名CAT content validity, adaptive item bank content coverage, content balancing in CAT, CAT blueprint validityIRT, latent trait theory, item characteristic curve theory, modern test theory
関連65
概要Content validity in computerized adaptive testing (CAT) ensures that an adaptively administered assessment adequately samples the intended content domain despite delivering only a subset of items to each examinee. It integrates classical content validity methods with CAT-specific item bank design and content balancing algorithms to guarantee representative domain coverage at both the item bank and the individual test level.Item response theory models the probability that a respondent answers an item correctly (or endorses it) as a function of the respondent's latent trait level and the item's own statistical properties — difficulty, discrimination, and guessing. Unlike classical test theory, IRT places persons and items on the same scale, yielding measurement that is sample-independent for items and test-independent for persons.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Computerized Adaptive Test Content Validity · Item Response Theory. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare