手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| コンピュータ適応型テスト(CAT)における内容妥当性× | コンピュータ適応型テスト(CAT)における構成概念妥当性× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 心理測定学 | 心理測定学 |
| 系統 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 提唱年≠ | 1975 / 1980 | 1989–2000s |
| 提唱者≠ | Lawshe (content validity); Lord & Weiss (CAT framework) | Samuel Messick (unified validity framework); CAT application formalized by Wainer, van der Linden, and colleagues |
| 種類≠ | Validity evaluation / test design | Validity evaluation / psychometric evidence gathering |
| 原典≠ | Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. link ↗ | Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13–103). American Council on Education / Macmillan. link ↗ |
| 別名 | CAT content validity, adaptive item bank content coverage, content balancing in CAT, CAT blueprint validity | CAT construct validity, adaptive test construct validation, CAT validity evidence, construct validity evidence in CAT |
| 関連 | 6 | 6 |
| 概要≠ | Content validity in computerized adaptive testing (CAT) ensures that an adaptively administered assessment adequately samples the intended content domain despite delivering only a subset of items to each examinee. It integrates classical content validity methods with CAT-specific item bank design and content balancing algorithms to guarantee representative domain coverage at both the item bank and the individual test level. | Construct validity in computerized adaptive testing evaluates whether the latent trait estimates produced by a CAT instrument genuinely measure the intended psychological or educational construct. Because adaptive algorithms select items individually for each examinee, the validity evidence gathered must account for the variable item exposure and the IRT-based scoring that are unique to CAT administrations. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|