ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

比較歴史アーカイブ研究×文書分析×
分野フィールド調査法質的研究
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年Late 19th century (archival foundations); mid-20th century (comparative systematic application)1920
提唱者Leopold von Ranke (archival history); Theda Skocpol, Barrington Moore (comparative-historical synthesis)Max Weber and Karl Mannheim
種類Qualitative comparative research designMethod
原典Skocpol, T. (1979). States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0521294997Scott, J. (1990). A Matter of Record: Documentary Sources in Social Research. Polity Press. ISBN: 978-0745608419
別名comparative-historical analysis, cross-national archival research, comparative archival history, CHARdocumentary analysis, textual analysis, content analysis of documents, archival research
関連64
概要Comparative historical archival research combines systematic examination of primary archival sources across two or more historical cases — nations, regions, institutions, or time periods — to identify causal patterns, structural similarities, and divergences that single-case histories cannot reveal. It is the method of choice when researchers want to explain why similar or different outcomes emerged across distinct historical contexts using documentary evidence.Document analysis is a systematic qualitative research method for examining written, visual, or audiovisual sources—such as policy documents, historical records, organizational records, media reports, emails, social media posts, photographs, or videos—to extract meaning, identify patterns, and understand social phenomena. Developed by Weber and Mannheim in early 20th-century sociology, the method bridges historical research, content analysis, and textual interpretation. Document analysis is used across disciplines to understand organizational change, policy evolution, media representation, historical events, and cultural meaning. Documents provide evidence of what organizations, institutions, or societies value, decide, and communicate, often revealing contradictions between policy and practice.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Comparative Historical Archival Research · Document Analysis. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare