ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

クラスターランダム化比較試験×適応的試験デザイン×
分野臨床研究臨床研究
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1999-20001990s-2000s
提唱者Campbell, Grimshaw, Elbourne et al.Stephen Pocock, Christopher Jennison, and statistical methodologists; FDA formalized guidance 2019
種類Research DesignResearch Design
原典Campbell, M. K., Grimshaw, J. M., & Elbourne, D. R. (2000). Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 4, 30. link ↗Pocock, S. J. (2005). Current issues in the design and interpretation of clinical trials. BMJ, 330(7500), 1118–1121. link ↗
別名CRT, cluster RCT, cluster trial, group randomizationadaptive trial, adaptive design, response-adaptive randomization, RAR
関連31
概要A cluster randomized trial (CRT) randomizes intact groups—schools, clinics, villages, or hospital wards—rather than individuals. Developed by Campbell, Grimshaw, and colleagues in the late 1990s to address real-world settings where intervention delivery or contamination occurs at the group level, CRTs are now standard for evaluating population-level, community-based, and policy interventions.An adaptive trial design allows pre-specified modifications to the trial based on interim data—such as sample size re-estimation, stopping for futility or efficacy, dropping ineffective arms, or shifting randomization ratios toward better-performing treatments. Developed systematically in the 1990s–2000s by statisticians like Pocock and Jennison, and formalized by the FDA in 2019, adaptive designs accelerate drug development, reduce exposure to ineffective treatments, and improve efficiency without inflating false-positive rates when properly executed.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Cluster Randomized Trial · Adaptive Trial Design. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare