ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

因果発見アルゴリズム (PC, FCI, LiNGAM)×因果推論のための操作変数(IV)法×
分野因果推論医療経済学
系統Regression modelProcess / pipeline
提唱年20001990s (modern applications)
提唱者Spirtes, Glymour & Scheines (PC/FCI); Shimizu et al. (LiNGAM)Angrist & Pischke (applied econometrics); rooted in econometric theory
種類Causal structure learningMethod
原典Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., & Scheines, R. (2000). Causation, Prediction, and Search (2nd ed.). MIT Press. ISBN: 978-0262194402Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press. link ↗
別名PC algorithm, FCI algorithm, LiNGAM, causal structure learningIV, two-stage least squares, TSLS, causal estimation
関連53
概要Causal discovery is a family of algorithms that automatically learn a directed acyclic graph (DAG) describing causal structure directly from observational data. The constraint-based PC and FCI algorithms were developed by Spirtes, Glymour and Scheines (2000), while the LiNGAM model of Shimizu et al. (2006) exploits linear non-Gaussian structure to orient edges.Instrumental variables (IV) is an econometric method to estimate causal effects when treatment or exposure is not randomly assigned and confounding is severe or unmeasured. IV relies on a third variable (instrument) that influences treatment but does not directly affect the outcome, allowing researchers to isolate the causal effect from the noise of confounding. Developed extensively in econometrics (Angrist & Pischke, 1990s–2000s), IV methods are increasingly used in health economics and health services research to leverage natural experiments and policy changes.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Causal Discovery Algorithms · Instrumental Variables in Health Research. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare