ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

標識再捕獲法による個体数推定×ポアソン回帰と負の二項回帰×
分野調査方法論計量経済学
系統Regression modelRegression model
提唱年19781998
提唱者Otis, Burnham, White & AndersonCameron & Trivedi (textbook treatment); Hilbe (negative binomial)
種類Probabilistic population size estimatorGeneralized linear model for count data
原典Otis, D. L., Burnham, K. P., White, G. C., & Anderson, D. R. (1978). Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildlife Monographs, 62, 3–135. link ↗Cameron, A. C. & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression Analysis of Count Data. Cambridge University Press. DOI ↗
別名Mark-Recapture, Tag-Recapture, Mark-Release-Recapture, İşaretle-Yeniden Yakalacount regression, log-linear count model, negative binomial regression, Poisson / Negatif Binom Regresyon
関連24
概要Capture-recapture (also known as mark-recapture) is a statistical method for estimating the size of an unknown population by sampling it twice and tracking which individuals appear in both samples. Formally systematized for closed animal populations by Otis, Burnham, White, and Anderson in their landmark 1978 Wildlife Monographs paper, the method extends naturally to human populations, epidemiology, and incomplete administrative records.Poisson regression is a generalized linear model for count outcomes — events tallied as non-negative integers such as hospital admissions, accidents, or article counts. It models the log of the expected count as a linear function of the predictors, and is developed in the standard count-data treatment of Cameron and Trivedi (1998); when the counts are over-dispersed, the closely related negative binomial model (Hilbe, 2011) is preferred.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Capture-Recapture · Poisson Regression. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare