手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| Angoff Standard Setting× | 項目応答理論 (IRT)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野≠ | Education | 心理測定学 |
| 系統≠ | Process / pipeline | Latent structure |
| 提唱年≠ | 1971 | 1952–1968 |
| 提唱者≠ | William H. Angoff | Frederic M. Lord (and Allan Birnbaum for the 2PL/3PL models) |
| 種類≠ | Test-centered standard-setting procedure for establishing cut scores | Probabilistic measurement model |
| 原典≠ | Cizek, G. J., & Bunch, M. B. (2007). Standard Setting: A Guide to Establishing and Evaluating Performance Standards on Tests. Sage. ISBN: 9781412916820 | Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Addison-Wesley. link ↗ |
| 別名 | Angoff Method, Modified Angoff Method, Yes/No Angoff, Angoff Cut-Score Procedure | IRT, latent trait theory, item characteristic curve theory, modern test theory |
| 関連≠ | 3 | 5 |
| 概要≠ | The Angoff method is a test-centered procedure for establishing a passing score (cut score) on an examination. A panel of content experts conceptualizes a 'borderline' or minimally competent examinee and, for each item, estimates the probability that such an examinee would answer it correctly. Summing those probabilities yields a recommended cut score for each panelist, and averaging across panelists and discussion rounds produces the performance standard. It is among the most widely used standard-setting methods in licensure, certification, and K-12 testing. | Item response theory models the probability that a respondent answers an item correctly (or endorses it) as a function of the respondent's latent trait level and the item's own statistical properties — difficulty, discrimination, and guessing. Unlike classical test theory, IRT places persons and items on the same scale, yielding measurement that is sample-independent for items and test-independent for persons. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|