ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

アクションリサーチ×デザインベース研究×
分野質的研究フィールド調査法
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年19461992
提唱者Kurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & BradburyAnn L. Brown and Allan Collins (independently, 1992)
種類MethodInterventionist qualitative-quantitative mixed methodology
原典Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. DOI ↗Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178. DOI ↗
別名Participatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative InquiryDBR, design research, design experiment, educational design research
関連16
概要Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement.Design-based research (DBR) is an iterative, interventionist methodology that simultaneously designs educational interventions and builds theory about how and why those interventions work in authentic, complex settings. Originating in Ann Brown's 1992 classroom experiments and Allan Collins's parallel work, DBR treats the learning environment as both the object of study and the site of theory generation, cycling through design, enactment, analysis, and redesign until both practical improvement and theoretical insight are achieved.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Action Research · Design-based Research. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare