Disruption Index (CD-Index)
The disruption index, or CD index, classifies a scientific paper or patent by how the work that cites it treats the work it built on. Introduced by Russell Funk and Jason Owen-Smith in 2017 as a dynamic network measure of technological change, and popularized for science by Lingfei Wu, Dashun Wang, and James Evans in 2019, it asks a simple structural question: when later researchers cite a focal work, do they also keep citing that work's own references, or do they cite the focal work instead of its predecessors? If subsequent work cites the focal item but largely ignores its references, the item has disrupted its field, eclipsing what came before; if subsequent work cites both the item and its references together, the item has consolidated existing knowledge. The index runs from -1 (purely consolidating) to +1 (purely disrupting) and has become a standard tool for measuring whether contributions push science in new directions or deepen established lines.
手法の全文を読む
無料アカウントでログインすると、このセクションを読めます。
手法マップ
関連する手法の近傍 — ノードを選択して探索できます。
出典
- Funk, R. J., & Owen-Smith, J. (2017). A Dynamic Network Measure of Technological Change. Management Science, 63(3), 791-817. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2366 ↗
- Wu, L., Wang, D., & Evans, J. A. (2019). Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology. Nature, 566, 378-382. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-0941-9 ↗
このページの引用方法
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Disruption Index (CD-Index): Measuring Consolidating versus Destabilizing Science and Technology. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/ja/bibliometrics/cd-index-disruption
どの手法を選ぶ?
この手法を最も近い類縁の手法と並べ、両者を見比べてください — ライブラリは本を机の上に並べるだけ。選ぶのはあなたです。
- Citation Distribution Modeling (Lognormal/Tsallis)計量書誌学↔ 比較
- Patent–Paper Citation Linkage (NPL)計量書誌学↔ 比較
- Sleeping Beauties and Delayed Recognition計量書誌学↔ 比較