ScholarGate
Assistente
Process / pipelineResilience frameworks / composite resilience indices

Urban Resilience Assessment

Urban resilience assessment evaluates how well a city can absorb, adapt to, and recover from shocks such as floods, earthquakes and pandemics and from chronic stresses such as poverty and ageing infrastructure. Most assessments are framework-driven composite indices: they define resilience dimensions — infrastructural, social, economic, ecological and institutional — gather indicators for each, normalise and weight them, and aggregate to a resilience score or profile. Because, as Meerow, Newell and Stults documented, 'urban resilience' is defined in conflicting ways across the literature, every assessment must first take a position on what resilience means, for whom, and against which disturbances.

Apri in MethodMindIn arrivoApplica, confronta, ottieni indicazioni
Strumenti e risorse
Scarica le diapositive
Impara ed esplora
VideoIn arrivo

Leggi il metodo completo

Riservato ai membri

Accedi con un account gratuito per leggere questa sezione.

Accedi

Mappa dei metodi

Il vicinato dei metodi correlati — seleziona un nodo per esplorare.

Fonti

  1. Meerow, S., Newell, J. P., & Stults, M. (2016). Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147, 38–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011

Come citare questa pagina

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Urban Resilience Assessment (Frameworks and Indices for City Resilience to Shocks and Stresses). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/it/urban-studies/urban-resilience-assessment

Quale metodo?

Affianca questo metodo ai suoi parenti più prossimi e leggili fianco a fianco — la biblioteca dispone i libri sul tavolo; la scelta è tua.

Confronta affiancati

Citato da

ScholarGateUrban Resilience Assessment (Urban Resilience Assessment (Frameworks and Indices for City Resilience to Shocks and Stresses)). Consultato il 2026-06-24 da https://scholargate.app/it/urban-studies/urban-resilience-assessment · Insieme di dati: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026