Analytic Hierarchy Process for Strategic Priorities
The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) applied to strategic priorities is a multi-criteria decision method that structures a complex strategy choice into a hierarchy of goal, criteria, and alternatives, then derives priority weights from expert pairwise comparisons. Thomas Saaty developed AHP in the 1970s and set out its full theory in his 1980 book, with a widely cited 1990 article distilling how to make a decision with the method. Its appeal for strategy is that it converts the qualitative judgments managers actually make — that growth matters more than cost control, say — into ratio-scale weights, while quantifying and policing the consistency of those judgments. The result is a transparent, defensible ranking of strategic options that integrates multiple, often conflicting, criteria.
Leggi il metodo completo
Accedi con un account gratuito per leggere questa sezione.
Mappa dei metodi
Il vicinato dei metodi correlati — seleziona un nodo per esplorare.
Fonti
- Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 9780070543713
- Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9-26. DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I ↗
Come citare questa pagina
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Analytic Hierarchy Process for Strategic Priorities (Pairwise-Comparison Prioritization of Strategic Decisions). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/it/strategic-management/ahp-strategic-priorities
Quale metodo?
Affianca questo metodo ai suoi parenti più prossimi e leggili fianco a fianco — la biblioteca dispone i libri sul tavolo; la scelta è tua.
- Porter's Five Forces Industry AnalysisGestione strategica↔ confronta
- Strategic Importance-Performance AnalysisGestione strategica↔ confronta
- SWOT-AHP Hybrid AnalysisGestione strategica↔ confronta
Citato da
Metodi simili
Hai notato un problema in questa pagina? Segnalalo o proponi una correzione →