Wordfish Scaling
Wordfish scaling is an unsupervised text-as-data method that estimates a single latent position for each political document — a party manifesto, a legislative speech, a press release — directly from its word frequencies, without any reference texts or hand coding. Introduced by Slapin and Proksch in 2008, it models word counts as draws from a Poisson distribution whose rate depends on a document position and word-specific parameters, recovering, for example, a left–right ordering of parties purely from how often each word appears in each text.
Leggi il metodo completo
Accedi con un account gratuito per leggere questa sezione.
Mappa dei metodi
Il vicinato dei metodi correlati — seleziona un nodo per esplorare.
Fonti
- Slapin, J. B., & Proksch, S.-O. (2008). A Scaling Model for Estimating Time-Series Party Positions from Texts. American Journal of Political Science, 52(3), 705–722. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00338.x ↗
- Lowe, W., & Benoit, K. (2013). Validating Estimates of Latent Traits from Textual Data Using Human Judgment as a Benchmark. Political Analysis, 21(3), 298–313. DOI: 10.1093/pan/mpt002 ↗
- Grimmer, J., & Stewart, B. M. (2013). Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts. Political Analysis, 21(3), 267–297. DOI: 10.1093/pan/mps028 ↗
Come citare questa pagina
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Wordfish Scaling of Political Texts (Unsupervised Position Estimation). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/it/political-science/wordfish-scaling
Quale metodo?
Affianca questo metodo ai suoi parenti più prossimi e leggili fianco a fianco — la biblioteca dispone i libri sul tavolo; la scelta è tua.
- Ideal Point EstimationPolitical Science↔ confronta
- Manifesto CodingPolitical Science↔ confronta
- WordfishPsicometria↔ confronta
- WordscoresPsicometria↔ confronta
Citato da
Metodi simili
Hai notato un problema in questa pagina? Segnalalo o proponi una correzione →