Most Different Systems Design
The most different systems design (MDSD) is a small-N comparative strategy that selects cases that differ on as many background characteristics as possible yet share the same outcome. If wildly dissimilar cases nonetheless converge on the same result, the explanation cannot lie in the many features on which they differ — it must lie in whatever they have in common. Grounded in John Stuart Mill's method of agreement and named by Przeworski and Teune, it is the mirror image of the most similar systems design and a staple of comparative politics.
Leggi il metodo completo
Accedi con un account gratuito per leggere questa sezione.
Mappa dei metodi
Il vicinato dei metodi correlati — seleziona un nodo per esplorare.
Fonti
- Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley-Interscience. ISBN: 9780471701422
- Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308. DOI: 10.1177/1065912907313077 ↗
- Gerring, J. (2007). Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521676564
Come citare questa pagina
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Most Different Systems Design (Comparative Method of Agreement). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/it/political-science/most-different-systems-design
Quale metodo?
Affianca questo metodo ai suoi parenti più prossimi e leggili fianco a fianco — la biblioteca dispone i libri sul tavolo; la scelta è tua.
- Most Similar Systems DesignPolitical Science↔ confronta
- Process TracingPsicometria↔ confronta
- Qualitative Comparative AnalysisPolitical Science↔ confronta
Citato da
Metodi simili
Hai notato un problema in questa pagina? Segnalalo o proponi una correzione →