ScholarGate
Assistente
Process / pipelineComparative / historical analysis

Comparative Historical Analysis

Comparative historical analysis (CHA) is a macro-causal research tradition that explains large-scale outcomes — revolutions, regime change, welfare states, development paths — by systematically comparing a small number of cases reconstructed in depth across historical time. It combines cross-case comparison with close attention to temporality: sequences, timing, critical junctures, and path dependence. Associated with Barrington Moore, Theda Skocpol, and codified by Mahoney and Rueschemeyer, CHA treats history not as background but as the medium through which causes operate.

Apri in MethodMindIn arrivoApplica, confronta, ottieni indicazioni
Strumenti e risorse
Scarica le diapositive
Impara ed esplora
VideoIn arrivo

Leggi il metodo completo

Riservato ai membri

Accedi con un account gratuito per leggere questa sezione.

Accedi

Mappa dei metodi

Il vicinato dei metodi correlati — seleziona un nodo per esplorare.

Fonti

  1. Mahoney, J., & Rueschemeyer, D. (Eds.) (2003). Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521016452
  2. Skocpol, T. (1979). States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521294997

Come citare questa pagina

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Comparative Historical Analysis (Macro-Causal Comparison of Cases over Time). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/it/political-science/comparative-historical-analysis

Quale metodo?

Affianca questo metodo ai suoi parenti più prossimi e leggili fianco a fianco — la biblioteca dispone i libri sul tavolo; la scelta è tua.

Confronta affiancati

Citato da

ScholarGateComparative Historical Analysis (Comparative Historical Analysis (Macro-Causal Comparison of Cases over Time)). Consultato il 2026-06-24 da https://scholargate.app/it/political-science/comparative-historical-analysis · Insieme di dati: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026