ScholarGate
Assistente
Process / pipelineElectoral systems / proportionality measures

Gallagher Disproportionality Index

The Gallagher disproportionality index, also called the least squares index (LSq), is the standard summary measure of how faithfully an electoral system translates votes into seats. Introduced by Michael Gallagher in 1991, it takes the difference between each party's vote share and its seat share, squares those differences, sums and halves them, and takes the square root. Because deviations are squared before aggregation, the index gives disproportionate weight to a few large discrepancies rather than many small ones, capturing the intuition that one badly over- or under-represented party distorts the result more than scattered rounding errors. It has become the most widely reported single-number diagnostic of electoral-system performance in comparative political economy.

Apri in MethodMindIn arrivoApplica, confronta, ottieni indicazioni
Strumenti e risorse
Scarica le diapositive
Impara ed esplora
VideoIn arrivo

Leggi il metodo completo

Riservato ai membri

Accedi con un account gratuito per leggere questa sezione.

Accedi

Mappa dei metodi

Il vicinato dei metodi correlati — seleziona un nodo per esplorare.

Fonti

  1. Gallagher, M. (1991). Proportionality, Disproportionality and Electoral Systems. Electoral Studies, 10(1), 33-51. DOI: 10.1016/0261-3794(91)90004-C

Come citare questa pagina

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Gallagher Least Squares Index of Electoral Disproportionality. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/it/political-economy/gallagher-disproportionality-index

Quale metodo?

Affianca questo metodo ai suoi parenti più prossimi e leggili fianco a fianco — la biblioteca dispone i libri sul tavolo; la scelta è tua.

Confronta affiancati

Citato da

ScholarGateGallagher Disproportionality Index (Gallagher Least Squares Index of Electoral Disproportionality). Consultato il 2026-06-25 da https://scholargate.app/it/political-economy/gallagher-disproportionality-index · Insieme di dati: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026