ScholarGate
Assistente

Confronta i metodi

Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.

Web Controversy Analysis×Controversy Mapping×
CampoScience Technology StudiesScience Technology Studies
FamigliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Anno di origine20122010
IdeatoreTommaso Venturini, Noortje MarresBruno Latour (Sciences Po médialab); codified by Tommaso Venturini
TipoWeb-native controversy research methodQualitative descriptive method and pedagogy
Fonte seminaleVenturini, T. (2012). Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 796-812. DOI ↗Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: how to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258-273. DOI ↗
AliasWeb controversy mapping, Hyperlink controversy analysis, Online controversy cartographyCartography of controversies, Mapping scientific controversies, Controversy analysis
Correlati44
SintesiWeb controversy analysis studies scientific, technical, and public controversies through the traces they leave online—hyperlink networks, search-engine results, and social-media activity. Building on the controversy-mapping tradition but reworking it as a web-native digital method, it follows Tommaso Venturini's call to 'build on faults' and Noortje Marres's argument for controversy analysis as a digital method, using crawling and co-link analysis to reveal how positions in a dispute are connected, opposed, and arranged across the web.Controversy mapping is a descriptive method for exploring and representing socio-technical disputes while they are still open and unsettled, before they harden into accepted facts or stable technologies. Developed as a teaching practice by Bruno Latour and codified by Tommaso Venturini at the Sciences Po médialab, it asks the analyst to dive into the heat of a debate, follow the actors and their arguments without prematurely taking sides, and render the resulting complexity legible through maps and visualisations. It treats controversy not as a pathology to be resolved but as the privileged moment in which the social and the technical are visibly being assembled.
ScholarGateInsieme di dati
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED

Vai alla ricerca Scarica le diapositive

ScholarGateConfronta i metodi: Web Controversy Analysis · Controversy Mapping. Consultato il 2026-06-24 da https://scholargate.app/it/compare