ScholarGate
Assistente

Confronta i metodi

Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.

Statistical Reporting Standards×Struttura IMRaD: Introduzione, Metodi, Risultati e Discussione×
CampoScrittura accademicaScrittura accademica
FamigliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Anno di origine20051970
IdeatoreStatistical and methodological literature; emphasized by Cumming (2013), ICMJE, and replication crisis discussionsInternational scientific publishing community (adopted widely by 1970s)
TipoGuidelineGuideline
Fonte seminaleCumming, G. (2013). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25(1), 7–29. DOI ↗International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2023). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. link ↗
Aliasreporting statistics, statistical transparency, effect size reportingIMRaD, IMRAD, scientific manuscript structure
Correlati45
SintesiTransparent reporting of statistical results—including effect sizes, confidence intervals, p-values, and assumptions—is essential for scientific integrity and reproducibility. Many published studies report p-values in isolation without effect sizes or confidence intervals, making it impossible for readers to assess the magnitude of findings. Statistical reporting standards, emphasized by Cumming (2013), the American Statistical Association, and the ICMJE, require effect sizes, confidence intervals, and discussion of uncertainty. This enables readers to judge whether findings are practically significant (not just statistically significant) and to compare effect sizes across studies in meta-analyses. Poor statistical reporting wastes research and prevents proper synthesis of evidence.IMRaD is the standard organizational framework for scientific manuscripts in biomedical and natural sciences research. It separates reporting into four sequential sections—Introduction (why the research was conducted), Methods (how it was done), Results (what was found), and Discussion (what the findings mean)—enabling readers to understand, evaluate, and reproduce the work. Adopted as best practice by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) since the 1970s, IMRaD structure is now mandated or strongly recommended by most peer-reviewed journals.
ScholarGateInsieme di dati
  1. v1
  2. 3 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Fonti
  3. PUBLISHED

Vai alla ricerca Scarica le diapositive

ScholarGateConfronta i metodi: Statistical Reporting Standards · IMRaD Structure. Consultato il 2026-06-15 da https://scholargate.app/it/compare