Confronta i metodi

	Regressione Robusta	Regressione Lasso	Regressione quantilica
Campo	Statistica	Apprendimento automatico	Econometria
Famiglia	Regression model	Machine learning	Regression model
Anno di origine	1964	1996	1978
Ideatore	Peter J. Huber (M-estimation, 1964); Frank Hampel (influence function, 1974)	Tibshirani, R.	Koenker & Bassett
Tipo	Regression with outlier resistance	Regularized linear regression (L1 penalty)	Conditional quantile regression
Fonte seminale	Huber, P. J. (1964). Robust estimation of a location parameter. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 35(1), 73–101.	Tibshirani, R. (1996). Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 58(1), 267–288.	Koenker, R. & Bassett, G., Jr. (1978). Regression Quantiles. Econometrica, 46(1), 33-50.
Alias	M-estimation regression, robust linear regression, outlier-resistant regression, MM-estimation	LASSO Regresyonu, lasso, L1-regularized regression, L1 regularization	conditional quantile regression, regression quantiles, Kantil Regresyon
Correlati	6	4	5
Sintesi	Robust regression estimates the linear relationship between a continuous outcome and predictors while sharply reducing the influence of outliers and leverage points. Unlike OLS, which is highly sensitive to extreme observations, robust methods assign down-weighted influence to atypical data points, producing coefficient estimates that remain stable even when a fraction of the data is contaminated or non-normally distributed.	Lasso regression, introduced by Robert Tibshirani in 1996, is a linear regression method that adds an L1 penalty to the loss so that it shrinks coefficients and performs variable selection at the same time, producing a sparse model. By driving some coefficients exactly to zero it keeps only the predictors that matter.	Quantile regression models conditional quantiles of an outcome - the median, the 25th or 75th percentile, and so on - rather than the conditional mean that OLS targets. Introduced by Koenker and Bassett in 1978, it reveals how predictors act across the whole distribution, including its tails.