Confronta i metodi
Esamina i metodi selezionati fianco a fianco; le righe che differiscono sono evidenziate.
| Strumento di Screening per la Malnutrizione (MST)× | Indice di Katz per l'Indipendenza nelle Attività della Vita Quotidiana (ADL)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Campo | Scienze infermieristiche | Scienze infermieristiche |
| Famiglia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Anno di origine≠ | 1999 | 1963 |
| Ideatore≠ | Michelle Ferguson | Sidney Katz |
| Tipo≠ | Patient self-report screening tool | Clinician-rated or observational functional assessment |
| Fonte seminale≠ | Ferguson, M., Capra, S., Bauer, J., & Banks, M. (1999). Development of a valid and reliable malnutrition screening tool for adult acute hospital patients. Nutrition, 15(6), 458-464. DOI ↗ | Katz, S., Ford, A. B., Moskowitz, R. W., Jackson, B. A., & Jaffe, M. W. (1963). Studies of Illness in the Aged: The Index of ADL, a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA, 185(12), 914-919. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | MST, Malnutrition Screening, Nutritional Risk Screen | Katz Index, Katz ADL Scale, Index of ADL |
| Correlati | 3 | 3 |
| Sintesi≠ | The Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST), developed by Michelle Ferguson and colleagues in 1999, is a brief, validated screening instrument designed to identify hospitalized patients at risk for malnutrition. The tool consists of two simple questions about recent unintentional weight loss and reduced food intake, yielding a quick numerical score. Since its publication, the MST has become widely adopted in acute hospitals, residential aged care facilities, and community settings as a rapid, reliable first-line screen for nutritional risk. | The Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living, developed by Sidney Katz and colleagues in 1963, is one of the earliest and most widely used tools for assessing functional status in older adults and persons with chronic illness. The scale evaluates six essential self-care activities (bathing, dressing, toileting, transfer, continence, feeding) through direct observation or interview and assigns an overall grade (A through G) reflecting the degree of independence. It remains a foundational instrument in geriatric assessment, rehabilitation medicine, and long-term care settings. |
| ScholarGateInsieme di dati ↗ |
|
|